AI is driving a lot of conversations right now. But for finance and people teams, the more important story isn’t the AI itself, but what it finally makes possible in a part of the business that has historically been hard to manage with precision: people spend.
Marketing went through a similar evolution years ago. Before CRMs, it was difficult to measure the impact of marketing investments. Once technology made performance visible, the CMO’s role changed. Decisions became data-driven, accountability increased, and investment followed results.
The same transformation is now underway in how companies manage compensation and the overall investment they make in their people. AI is accelerating change, but technology adoption in the people space has lagged over the years. The data foundations and systems needed to make this technology useful weren’t in place. As those foundations come into place, a clear gap is emerging between organizations that can use this technology effectively and those that cannot.
For people‑first companies, employees represent the largest spend on the company income statement. Yet many organizations still struggle to answer foundational questions: What are we actually spending on people? Where is that spend going? And what return are we getting on the investment?
This isn’t a failure of intent. When companies make critical compensation decisions, they don’t rely on spreadsheets because they prefer them. They rely on them because, for a long time, spreadsheets were the only viable way to work with people data that was fragmented, inconsistent, and hard to trust.
Managing people spend this way is like driving while looking in the rearview mirror. You can see where you’ve been, but you have very little visibility into what’s ahead.
AI doesn’t fix that problem by itself.
AI only works when the foundation is right. To be effective, it requires two things: well‑organized data and models designed to answer the right questions. Without structured, connected employee data, AI doesn’t create insight. It simply accelerates confusion.
If companies want to truly drive employee-investment ROI, this is the work that matters. Organized people data means clear job architecture, consistent role definitions, reliable benchmarking, and systems that are connected and usable. Don’t mistake this for administrative cleanup. It’s the foundation for managing people spend with the same discipline applied to financial data.
Without that foundation, companies rarely realize the efficiencies AI promises. People teams remain overextended because their time is spent organizing and reconciling data rather than analyzing it. Decisions stay reactive, and compensation planning continues to rely on assumptions instead of outcomes.
Leading organizations are already operating differently. They’ve centralized their people data, aligned their systems, and are using technology and AI to analyze compensation and workforce dynamics in near real time. That allows them to move beyond benchmarking as the endpoint and focus instead on outcomes that matter the most, like retention of critical talent, offer-acceptance rates, productivity, and return on people investment.
Benchmarking still plays an important role, but it’s context, not the conclusion. What matters most is whether compensation decisions are driving the results the business needs.
This evolution is also changing who owns the conversation. People analytics has traditionally lived with the chief people officer and that shouldn’t change. But CFOs are increasingly stepping into this space because it aligns naturally with how they already think: ROI, accountability, and trade‑offs. Strategic advisors won’t be replaced by AI, but those who avoid data‑driven decision-making will fall behind.
We’re seeing a similar pattern across professional services. As AI absorbs routine analytical work, firms are being forced to connect more directly to outcomes. Models built on historical assumptions are breaking down, replaced by a sharper focus on impact and value delivered.
The same is now true for compensation and people spend. Static spreadsheets and annual benchmarking cycles are giving way to real‑time analysis built on organized data. This isn’t a future state. It’s already happening.
The real risk for CFOs isn’t adopting AI too quickly. It’s assuming AI will fix problems rooted in how people data is structured and used. Companies that don’t modernize this foundation will continue managing people spend reactively, even as competitors move ahead with greater clarity and control.
The opportunity is significant. CFOs who can clearly see people spend, understand its drivers, and connect it directly to outcomes can manage their largest investment with far more precision. They can be proactive rather than reactive.
The question is simple: Are you set up to manage people spend for the business you’re running now, or are you still relying on tools built for a different era?
More from Kyle Holm:
Last Updated:
